
Automation testing involves frameworks that include test frameworks and guidelines to execute tests faster than manual testing. There are multiple automation frameworks available. Depending upon the application's complexity, the number of test cases, and the available resources, the QA team needs to decide the framework type.
The following post delves deep into the multiple automation frameworks.
The linear automation framework is the fundamental framework that is very commonly used. It is primarily used for testing small applications and is easy to understand. The test scripts are executed one after the other, following a particular sequence. Testers usually implement the framework to analyze a particular software feature or functionality.
It is also referred to as a record and playback framework, as the testers record all steps like navigation and user inputs. These steps or tests are then played back to understand their efficiencies.
Moreover, the test scripts are executed individually, following a particular sequence. The method follows an incremental approach, where every new software interaction will be added to the test process.
So, the process is not very complex for inexperienced testers to handle and master.
Here's an example of linear-driven framework.
The TestModule is responsible for setting up the Selenium WebDriver and performing a specific sequence of actions on the website. This approach is simple and easy to use for straightforward test cases, but may become unwieldy for more complex test cases.
The modular testing framework enables the tester to follow the “divide and conquer” approach. So, the tester can test each application section separately by dividing it into multiple modules. The process can be suitable for complex applications with many features to analyze.
In some cases, testers need to break down or divide the entire software according to the client's requirements. A linear framework will not be advantageous in such situations, but a modular framework will be ideal. So, the application will be divided into separate modules, which will be tested individually.
The tester will develop an individual test script for each module and combine the test with building a larger test representing the entire software. The process involves multiple steps such as test case generation, test execution report generation, and defect logging.
Moreover, after the tester has written a function library, it is possible to store a test script. Particular adjustments or modifications can be made to this included script, so the entire app need not be modified. These features improve the convenience for both developers and testers.
Let's consider the 'MainTest' class is the main entry point that calls different modules (in this case, 'LoginModule' and 'SearchModule') to perform specific tasks. Each module is responsible for setting up the Selenium WebDriver and performing specific actions on the website.
A data-driven framework will be beneficial when professionals need to test a particular scenario or function having multiple data sets. Testing becomes simpler as the framework separates the internal test logic from the data set.
This framework does not have data hard-coded into the test scripts, which is the primary difference between a modular and linear framework. So, when testers need to test a particular application feature multiple times, data decoupling becomes essential.
It comprises the following steps -
For example, a data-driven framework can help test the functionalities of a website login page. In this process, the tester will create a test data file that will contain the inputs for the driver script. It will also contain the expected output and results in a separate table. Then, the input values and the operators will then be tested by the driver or test script.
After comparing the expected results with the actual results received, the tester concludes the web page's functionality and efficiency. QED42’s open-source product, Headway, is a data-driven framework built using Selenium, Testng and Java.
The data and test script logic is separated in a keyword-driven framework. The data is stored externally, and every software function is included in a separate table. Moreover, specific keywords are assigned to particular actions used for GUI testing.
These keywords are arranged in a different table and represent GUI actions like click, log in or hyperlink. These are stored step-by-step and are associated with an object or area of the UI being tested.
This is the major strength of the framework, as it makes the separate keyboards entities connected to functions. Testers write code to invoke a particular keyword-based action, and the corresponding test script will be executed.
The key elements of any keyword-driven framework are –
Here's an example of a keyword-driven framework in Java using Selenium. In this example, the MainTest class sets up test data in a HashMap and calls the KeywordModule to perform actions based on the keywords in the test data.
A hybrid test automation framework is a combination of multiple testing frameworks. Depending on a particular framework is not the best option for most testing projects. A hybrid framework leverages the strengths of numerous frameworks to execute tests properly.
It can be a combination of keyword-driven and data-driven frameworks. So, the test data and keywords can be externally stored. The test data can be stored in an excel file, and the keywords can be stored in a particular Java file.
The hybrid framework enables testers to experiment and combine other frameworks to suit the testing requirements. The scalable approach supports different testing environments and improves application efficiency.
Automation testing frameworks make the testing process smoother and allow testers to analyze the app thoroughly. By helping in bug detection and improving efficiency, these frameworks will boost the app deployment process. So, testers must select the automation framework according to their project or application requirements.
Testing frameworks must be selected according to the technical experience and expertise of the testers. Factors such as scalability, flexibility, and speed also need to be considered.
For instance, a linear framework does not need custom coding, but a hybrid framework will require coding expertise. Thus, careful consideration and interactions with senior professionals might be necessary for choosing a testing framework.
Headway is available for download on GitHub. Check out some of our automation strategy and testing work with global enterprises to know in detail how Headway minimizes risks and ensures impeccable quality at speed, helping our clients with faster go-to-market.

Web crawlers usually comprehend all the pages available on your website and index them. Then, how can we communicate to the web crawler to stop indexing all unwanted or private pages/info on our website? By implementing robots.txt!
Robots.txt is a map or a guide for the web crawlers for indexing your website. It is a file used to restrict the indexing of certain sections or pages of a website.
For example, you own an educational website but do not want confidential data, such as student details or account info, to be indexed. This task can be done using robots.txt. In the image below, you can see that robots.txt blocks the indexing of site sections like temp files, private files, and parts of databases.

Below are the few use cases where implementation of robots.txt file is preferred:
If there are no such use cases on your website, robots.txt is not required.
Robots.txt of any site exists on the root of the domain, and you can access it by clicking on https://mywebsite.com/robots.txt. Robots.txt file must always be placed in the root directory of the website so that it is easily accessible to the web crawlers.
Sample of a robots.txt file

Consider the below example of a robots.txt file for your website http://www.mywebsite.com/.
The above code in the robots.txt file means:
Since robots.txt is essential for indexing your website correctly, any error in setting up this file can cause serious SEO troubles or get your website deindexed. So, testing it before uploading is very crucial. Luckily, there are great tools available for auditing robots.txt.
Google has a free robots.txt Tester Tool available in Google Search Console. Select the registered website for the list under the crawl section and find the robot.txt tester link. After a scan, Google gives errors and warning details. Before uploading the robot.txt file, do a round of testing.

This application is an SEO auditing tool used to enhance the onsite SEO of the website. It can be used for multiple SEO tasks such as finding broken links, generating sitemaps, reviewing robots.txt files, and many more SEO audit-related features.
Download the application first to use it. Crawling up to 500 URLs is free. For more URLs, users will need to opt for a paid version.



The blocked URLs will have the status Blocked by robots.txt. The ‘Matched Robots.txt Line’ column specifies the line number and the disallow path of the robots.txt entry.


There are many more tools available online with which we can test robots.txt.
The right implementation of robots.txt will give the best outcomes in terms of SEO. Below are the best practices you should apply while implementing robots.txt on your website.
It is important to keep your robots.txt file updated whenever new pages are added or when there is any change in the website. There are a few limitations:
In general, robots.txt is good for a website’s SEO but not mandatory. Implementing robots.txt in the right way will ensure a higher SEO score and also the security of websites.

Page Object Model is an object design pattern that is popularly used in test automation for a better testing experience. In this technique, a Page class is created for each web page of the application. This Page class contains web elements and methods for action to be performed on these web elements. These web elements and methods are accessed by test cases, which are written in a separate Test class file.
Consider that you need to perform login action before booking a flight and viewing the itinerary. The login function is common for both booking flights and viewing itinerary scenarios. Instead of writing login web elements and methods in each page class, we can create one login page class, and reuse it in other page classes.
Cypress, a popular automation framework, provides features to support Page Object Model. In this article, we will cover the setup and end-to-end flow for the Page Object Model using Cypress (version 10).
To demonstrate the working of the page object model in Cypress, we will use newtoursdemosite as a demo site. We will implement the 'Login' scenario in this example. Let's start!
Create a 'pageobjects' folder under the 'cypress' folder of the project, which will store the page classes.
Create a page class 'loginPage.js' under the 'pageobjects' folder. In 'loginPage.js', we will store the web elements and write methods to perform login functionality.

Step 3
In loginPage.js, create a 'loginPage' class that we will export to the test spec file using 'export'.
Inside the class, create an object named 'elements'. 'elements' object contains a set of key and value pairs for locating web elements on the login page.
Then write methods for the following actions:
Create a 'tests' folder under the 'e2e' folder, which will store all test cases. Now, create a test spec file 'verifyLogin.spec.cy.js' under the 'tests' folder.

Note: For the cypress version below 10, create a 'tests' folder under 'integration'.
Import loginPage.js class to access its methods. Then create an instance of the loginPage.js class and call the respective methods.
Run the test in Cypress

You need to create a "get" and "set" command to define Object accessors. The advantage of using getter and setter is that we can use them as properties instead of functions.
Without Getter
With Getter
loginObj.enterUsername('selenium@qa')
loginObj.username.type('selenium@qa')

Note: Find the sample code snippets for these features in the GitHub repository here.
Go ahead and implement Page Object Model using Cypress in your project. And improve test readability, and code maintainability, and reduce code duplication.
Happy Testing!

Generally, a framework means a combination of rules and standards to follow for the best results. Similarly, an automation framework is a platform that combines tools and practices to run automation tests. Simply put, it provides a complete environment for your development teams to execute automated test scripts successfully.
The significant components in an automation framework are testing tools, procedures, scripts, libraries, and data management. These components facilitate test executions and comprehensive reports of test results.
The guidelines of an automation framework could include coding standards, repositories, data handling methods, results storing processes, or info on accessing external resources. While these guidelines are not mandatory for every automation framework, they make automation testing more organized with additional benefits.

Let’s explore how an automation framework can improve testing speed and efficiency.
QA teams can add new scripts to test more features or add in-depth scripts for complex use cases to an automation framework. Your team can execute numerous tests to cover all features and requirements in every test cycle.
There is no need for your QA team to input test data manually or monitor the test script for each test. An automation framework will run tests perfectly each time and prevent discrepancies between different coding standards.
An automation framework is cost-effective as it enables repetitive and parallel testing. It also allows for frequent testing of new features or changed objectives per your business need without extra costs. You can reduce significant costs that accompany changed scripts or bugs in a production pipeline.
Coding patterns are different within a team of developers, making multiple testing a necessity. An automation framework consolidates all coding data to enable easy and consistent scripting and reduce duplicate coding.
As your project scales in growth, there would be a need for upgrades, new features, and changes. An automation framework will grow with your project and fulfill all these necessities in a short time while maintaining all the required parameters.
An automation framework provides a clear and comprehensive report for every test executed, every bug discovered, every script written, and more. Your QA team can extract every inch of information and derive insights for assessing the project’s goals, and organizational goals.
An automation framework helps to break down the testing process into smaller, more manageable modules, making it easier to maintain and update the test suite. You can categorize and store specific test data in external databases and configure them quickly, as the framework covers all sorts of apps in the process.
Writing effective test scripts takes time and effort, and an automation framework makes it convenient with reusable scripts. You can reuse test scripts as many times as you need, even with cross-browser testing or a change in the device OS.
An automation framework can integrate with other tools and technologies, such as continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. You can streamline the testing process and reduce the time to market with such powerful integrations.
With the automation industry progressing immensely, your business can build high-quality applications and meet the increasing security standards with an automation framework. You can make your development process more efficient and achieve optimal testing speed.
Consider, QED42’s open-source Selenium framework. It accelerates automation testing by 30% and increases test accuracy to 90%. Being open-source, Headway is free to use thereby reducing costs to a greater extent. It is available for download on GitHub.

The demand for rapid product development is increasing and driving quality standards higher and higher. Automation testing has transformed from a “good to have” component to a critical component in delivering best-in-class software quickly. The latest technologies have added more capabilities to test automation like codeless automation for example can be considered the future of modern testing.
When it comes to businesses, automation testing increases development speed and adds flexibility to development pipelines. While decision leaders accept test automation as a great idea, they hesitate to adopt it into the business. Reasons range from the uncertainty of costs involved to whether the costs justify the value delivered.
Your development team may be thinking about automated testing for a new project. Would it be productive for the project in the long run? Would your team be more productive with fewer manual regression tests? Can your business derive quantitative benefits from test automation to justify the investment?
We will consider all these questions and more in this blog. You will understand how to get the best ROI and some best practices to optimize automation testing.

A major challenge in software development is fixing defects. Longer delays between development and identifying defects increases time, expenses, and efforts to fix them. Test automation creates a tighter feedback loop to reduce the fixing time from weeks and months to minutes. Your business will not miss out on market opportunities due to testing holding up development. You will reduce defect costs by a large margin with automated testing.
It is typical to identify more regressions after adopting automation testing. While more regressions may seem like high costs for your business now, regressions found by users after your product is launched in the market tend to cause severe losses for your business. In the past, developers may see a failed test in the CI environment, identify the issue, and fix it quickly without documenting it. Test automation captures all defects and reduces the fixing time drastically enough to justify the regressions found and documents it for future insights.
Test automation makes testing time trend downward over significant periods leading to qualitative and quantitative benefits. Automated testing enables better test coverage with minimal manual intervention leading to better testable products. Your business can test such products in more ways, reduce the risk of missing use cases in testing, and go to market rapidly with quality applications.
Shift-left refers to the practice of evaluating quality, testing, and performance early in the development cycle. This practice is crucial to a business as it speeds up development efficiency and addresses any defects early in the development cycle before your apps get into production. Your development teams can deliver applications or software more frequently with high quality.
Regression is slow and does not help identify significant issues. Automated checking is more beneficial than manual checking as the performance is the same anytime and every time it is done. The procedures don’t change, the costs are lower for repeated testing, and your teams can easily identify and document a regression any time it happens.
A significant aspect in determining the ROI of automation testing lies in how your business approaches the implementation process. Automation testing has evolved enough to identify common pitfalls, and your business would benefit by avoiding these mistakes. Let’s consider a few of them.
While test automation is highly beneficial, it will not fit all scenarios or processes. The value of automated testing lies in running tests multiple times, but all cases do not require automation. If your development teams are working on diverse products, features, or processes, you may require manual testing in some cases along with automated testing. Your teams need to discern scenarios that require automated testing and scenarios that require manual testing to save your business money in the long run.
Your business needs to plan long-term ROI other than the initial costs and short-term calculations. You need to consider some questions that will help evaluate test automation ROI for now and in the future. Would automation testing help solve more issues for your company in the long run other than reducing QA time? Would it open new opportunities for your business to expand and grow? Will automated testing help to improve the quality of your products and development?
Automated testing is still based on coding and requires maintenance and upgrades if you want to derive value from them for years. Test maintenance takes time, so your business should consider it while planning implementation. Significant code changes might take away most of your development team’s time. Would your team be able to handle it? Or do you have a third-party partner doing test maintenance for your business? Do you want your business to handle long-term test maintenance? Answering these questions in the initial stage would help your business get the best ROI of test automation.
Documentation is essential to calculate automation testing ROI. Document everything your team does. Even if you have a key developer dropping out, your team will not be at risk of losing all progress or having to re-engineer multiple complex cases with accurate and detailed records. Proper documentation eliminates complete dependence on human expertise and ensures only necessary dependence just like test automation.

The basic formula for calculating ROI is universally applicable - (ROI = Cost Savings-Investment/Investment). However, the components, cases, metrics, and best practices may differ from business to business. The top three significant parameters that would apply to any business are:
The most important parameter in automation testing ROI is the cost. A critical decision revolving around automation testing is the investment in infrastructure. Factors like framework, test suite, and cloud hosting have a direct impact on the outcome of automated testing. While it seems expensive initially, it pays off in multiple long-term benefits.
Opting for test automation on the cloud ensures a scalable and secure infrastructure that is available to run tests at any time, regardless of the tester’s location. Benefits, such as reducing critical man hours or savings due to investment in in-house infrastructure result in huge cost savings in the long run. Remember that ROI on automation testing will not be evident right away, but once your business reaches breakeven, you can see the benefits.
Test coverage and accuracy are the significant value propositions for automation testing. A higher test coverage means a high probability of detecting bugs quickly, resulting in a high-quality product. You should align automation testing with integrations, such as CI/CD tools, product management tools, and bug tracking tools to expedite the process of defect discovery, issue tracking, and issue fixing.
Execution speed, test reporting, and QA are major factors in the automation testing ROI calculations. While they do not bring in direct financial benefits, they contribute to huge time savings and quality applications that benefit the overall product delivery timeline. Test automation enhances customer satisfaction with better products in less time.
Test automation can work 24/7 and can run a significantly large number of test cases within a short time. Tests are more accurate than manual tests and are executed at a much faster pace. Integrating test automation with CI/CD tools results in high-quality products and rapid product readiness, making the best out of continuous automation testing.
The time reduced in running rigorous test cycles and creating products with faster time-to-market leads to huge savings on the investment.
You can leverage test automation on a scalable test infrastructure to run:
A few parameters that can be integrated or used as stand-alone parameters for your business are:
Test automation implementation should include two vital factors: Gradual introduction and long-term strategy. Both factors contribute directly or indirectly to your business costs and returns. Knowing the best practices of the industry will help you implement test automation in the right way. Consider these three best practices while preparing to integrate automation testing into your business.
Trying to automate every test from day one is an extreme approach that will not benefit your business. As considered earlier, manual testing is required in some cases while you automate other tests. So, carefully consider your project pipeline and the testing needs of your business to start from the right place. Identify the ROI parameter most vital for your business and start from there.
Consider the long-term impact of automation testing as every testing will become a regression testing eventually. The best practice is to integrate new tests with existing tests as a part of your regression testing right away.
The traditional waterfall method where development and testing are done in different phases is less productive when compared to the advanced shift-left testing process. The shift-left method enables your teams to develop and test simultaneously. This method helps you detect any bugs early in the development cycle and fix them, saving your business much time and money.
Implementing an automation pipeline might seem like a daunting task when it comes to monetary, time, and effort investment. But understanding all the factors and calculating the ROI of automation testing will demonstrate how it adds value to your QA operations and business. Digital customers are prioritizing agility, and your business requires automation testing to deliver an agile experience to your customers.
Adopting automating testing will give you a head start on your market competition and empower you to become a dominant market player. While there is no shortcut to reaping the benefits of automated testing in one go as it depends on multiple factors, the best way is to choose the right test automation provider.

The automation of any process raises the user satisfaction of that specific project to the next level. However, CI/CD offers more than simply automation to eliminate human error. It helps businesses roll out innovative solutions promptly, effectively, and affordably for users. It is the ultimate cheat code for smoother operations as it enables the delivery of software with fewer risks, frequent deployment of additional features per user demands, and increased developer productivity.
There are various options available now for incorporating performance budgets into Continuous Integration. They ensure that an application does not exceed a specific data cap. Tracking a webpage's performance budget and integrating it with the CI/CD workflow can minimize the performance degradation caused by adding a new code.
Software delivery is a continuous loophole. CI/CD or Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment are two of its most crucial steps to maintain user satisfaction and operational standards. The entire process is reminiscent of an assembly line with well-defined steps that often need to be done and re-done throughout the software's lifetime.
CI/CD is the process of creating software that allows companies to deploy modifications at any moment in a sustainable manner. With regular code changes, development cycles become more relevant and speedy while maintaining frequency.
Four general steps make up the entire CI/CD process:
Continuous Integration impacts the areas of collaboration and quality control rather significantly. It helps quickly deploy features, allowing the DevOps team to maintain its quality standards. And CI allows it to happen quickly. Here's how:
Continuous Integration or CI is a development model underpinned by process mechanics and automation. During the CI stage, developers often submit their code to the version control repository. Most teams set a minimum benchmark of committing code at least once daily. The reasoning that prefaces this is that smaller code differentials allow easier detection of faults and other software quality concerns versus bigger codes created over long periods. When teams work on tighter cycles, it is less likely for many developers to modify the same code simultaneously, eliminating a merge when committing the code.
Continuous integration teams frequently commence projects by configuring version control and practice definitions. Although code is checked often, improvements and fixes are introduced in long and short time frames. Continuous Integration development teams use many ways to govern whether features and code are production-ready.
Many teams employ feature flags, a configuration mechanism that allows them to toggle features and code on and off at the run time. Features still in development are enveloped in code with feature flags, pushed to production alongside the main branch, and left off until their time of use. Feature flags offer improved testing and superior quality. Optimizely Rollouts, CloudBees Rollout, and LaunchDarkly are feature flagging tools that connect with CI/CD platforms and enable feature-level configurations.
Version control branching is another way of managing features. A branching strategy establishes a protocol for integrating new code into standard development, testing, and production branches. Additional branches are generated for features that may need longer development cycles. Once the feature is completed, the developers can merge the modifications from the feature branches into the main development branch. However, an effective strategy can be tough to manage when numerous features are created simultaneously. In such cases, one can automate the build process by packaging the software, databases, and other components.
In addition to bundling all application and database components, CI automates the execution of unit tests and other testing. This testing ensures that the developers' code modifications did not break any current unit tests.
CI/CD is a smart integration plan for any DevOps team. But why exactly should it be considered? Given below are a few reasons why.
Integrating CI and CD results in much quicker builds and faster delivery outputs. With deployments running in a continuous sequence, it enables a project's consistent tracking, provides real-time feedback, and repairs errors as required. Continuous reviews enable product development to remain tuned to end-user expectations.
The development pace is tremendous, and the delay between introducing and delivering a new feature is lessened considerably. The team devotes less time and effort to debugging and more time to creating new features. It also results in a shortened feedback loop, and the amount of time separating user participation and updates. As a result of using the CI/CD automated system, the DevOps team produces faster test results for the development and deployment of the application.
The CI/CD approach also requires continuous data monitoring of the development process. Once the procedures and insights become apparent, the team can optimize the existing workflow and remove engineering impediments. This results in a more sophisticated system and a quicker turnaround for the intended software solution.
The goal of CI/CD is to improve the integration process by breaking it down into essential and regular development tasks. That helps reduce build costs and discover errors early in the software lifecycle. It increases real-time transparency, allowing developers to work much more efficiently.
A performance budget is defined as a set of regulations placed on metrics that impact site performance. Performance metrics are a vital part of the user experience. It may include the overall page size, a site's load time on a mobile network, or the total number of HTTP requests sent. Setting a performance budget is the reference point for making design, technical, and feature decisions.
A budget allows designers to consider the impact of high-resolution photos and the number of web fonts they select. It also assists developers in comparing diverse solutions for an issue and evaluating libraries and frameworks based on characteristics, such as size and parsing costs.
A budget exists to represent a site's attainable objectives. It is a balance of user experience and other performance measures. It also entails many other advantages mentioned below.
A performance budget is essentially a rundown of the amount of data that the development of a website might require to create a well-functioning website. Little similar to allocating funds for a business. It ensures better utilization of resources and cuts down anticipated wastage.
The web continues to grow in size. The size of web pages is also increasing, as are the various resources necessary to display a webpage, such as graphics, scripts, and style sheets. A quick, responsive website is essential for a successful business. The performance budget is a strategy that places performance at the center of development and eliminates needless distractions that cause the site to slow down.
Performance budgeting plays a rather significant role in the allocation of funds. It explicitly maps out the objectives and uses for allocated funds, increasing visibility with budget planning.
Quantity-based metrics do not have a direct relationship to the user experience. However, they provide the critical advantage of providing metrics that are far easier to understand and prepare for than the effect on the user experience.
Performance budgeting allows the integration of three of the most significant aspects of site development. The budgeting enables a better understanding of the site requirements. That results in better programming of the site for its smooth functioning.
Being able to measure something is the only way to improve performance. It is especially true for websites where the metrics influence the overall website performance. Let's consider three primary performance budgeting metrics that track the user-friendliness of a website:
The majority of time-based metrics are referred to as "milestone timings." This metric type indicates how quickly specific components of the website load. DOMContentLoaded and load events are two of the most frequent events used to measure page load speed. However, they do not present a complete user experience because the server might send a minimal page to the user while deferring actual content load and display for many seconds.
Some of the essential timing metrics employed in a performance budget are as follows:
These metrics are consequential in the early phases of development since they illustrate the implications of including large pictures and scripts. It's much simpler to grasp the effect of one extra script, or another large picture, on a 300kb budget than on a SpeedIndex budget. They are also simple to convey to designers and developers and help their collaboration process. Their primary benefit is that they are considerably easier to envision throughout the design and development process.
Website speed testing tools such as WebPageTest and Lighthouse can generate performance ratings that users can use to define the site's performance budget. One can count on these tools to be generally consistent since they adhere to standard best practice criteria for measuring site performance. DevOps teams receive the best results when they monitor a mix of quantitative and user-centric performance measures. Focusing on asset quantities and tracking FCP and TTI can be beneficial in the early stages of a software development project. Lighthouse also provides tips on improving site performance and creating a performance budget.
WebPageTest: WebPageTest API is one of the most trusted website performance testing tools. It is a free tool that allows users to create an account and retrieve test results for a year. One can also use the WebPageTest API to automate the tests.
Lighthouse LightWallet: LightWallet is a feature integrated with Google Lighthouse that allows users to establish a performance budget. When testing a website with Lighthouse, it will immediately notify the user if any metrics exceed the budget limitations. Users can also use the Lighthouse Bot to define a performance budget and automate the performance testing process.
SpeedCurve: A high-end website speed testing and monitoring application, SpeedCurve also allows users to create performance budgets. If any metric exceeds budget limitations, the tool promptly sends an alert.
Calibre: Similar to SpeedCurve, Calibre is a premium performance tracking tool that allows users to define performance budgets and receive notifications when any metrics exceed the budget limit.
The current scenario requires organizations to go digital in some way or another. Even smaller businesses have a website or are looking to create websites to sell their services. Adopting CI/CD is a need rather than a choice. No matter how small the company is, website maintenance is a mammoth task that invites a lot of monetary investment. That is where performance budgeting tools can prove to be a worthwhile investment.
Performance budgeting can help in the efficient development, update, and integration of software. Performance budgeting tools can assist in focusing on improving site performance even more efficiently.
In addition to helping enhance site performance and speed, some of these tools are also available free of cost. It is a massive boon since it helps eliminate excessive monetary investments while maintaining a functional website.

Conducting traditional test automation is a key aspect of product analysis and increasing deployment speed. But the traditional approach of hand-coded automation requires programming expertise. Hence, companies face challenges in preparing robust test code.
As the programmer-centric approach creates a shortage of skilled human resources, companies want a modern solution. This gave birth to the codeless automation approach that enables developers to execute test scripts without writing code.
It allowed all team members to contribute to the test automation process. As such, more companies are planning to shift to codeless automation from traditional testing. It is hence not surprising that its demand is projected to grow at a 15.5% CAGR from 2021 to 2031!
Moreover, the approach allows testers to execute tests faster, resulting in quicker product delivery and release rates. Given these trendsetting benefits, this article will take a closer look at the crucial details of the codeless automation process.
Codeless test automation is a modern process where the tester can develop test scripts without writing code. It allows professionals to automate test script creation without being technically proficient.
Even if a tester doesn’t know a programming language, he can automate the scripts. A professional can also maintain test scripts conveniently through this approach without any coding. Thus, professionals, including the managers, software developers, and even release managers, can contribute to the testing process.
Moreover, unlike legacy testing tools, codeless testing offerings are equipped with artificial intelligence and machine learning which allows testers to create and modify test steps manually.
Additionally, codeless automation facilitates the creation of test flow diagrams, making the process even more convenient.
Hence, to sum up, codeless test automation is an excellent approach that frees up the testers’ and developers’ time so that they can utilize these working hours to focus on enhancing product strategies and improving testing activities.
For conducting codeless testing, testers do not necessarily need to know the exact code to move forward and hence they utilize codeless testing tools for developing the scripts.
The idea behind the process is to make executing, maintaining, and integrating test scripts convenient via a simple UI. This is done generally through two test automation approaches-
In this process, the tester performs the test manually, while the automation tool records any action that helps develop the test script.
As per product requirements, the testers can be modified and can edit this script which the company and professionals can execute later on. As such, this approach is highly prevalent among web-based product developers.
For instance, Katalon Studio, a very popular codeless automation platform, offers this feature.
In this approach, software testers develop a test flow diagram that consists of structured test blocks. Here, the test script will run automatically depending upon the actions present in the test flow diagram.
In this rapidly expanding market, organizations are always aiming to gain a competitive edge over other firms. Hence, product testing and developing test scripts need to be faster than before.
That’s why development teams try to implement multiple strategies for automation testing. They use technologies like no-code, low-code, and codeless tools interchangeably. However, these tools have specific characteristics that separate them.
Low code test automation tools allow developers of different technical skills to begin application development without manual coding. These tools offer built-in visual code blocks that the testers can drag and drop to develop applications.
With these tools, testers can avoid learning the latest programming frameworks or executing multiple tests for their application code. However, some amount of coding knowledge is still required for operating these tools.
That's why professionals with programming knowledge utilize these tools to enhance the speed of their development process. Although non-technical professionals might be able to work with low-code technologies, the projects will require coding at some point.
Lastly, low-code tools allow developers to conveniently build apps for several platforms and share them with stakeholders.
These tools are targeted at IT professionals who do not have actual programming knowledge or experience. They provide visual development along with drag and drop features. As such, both technical and non-technical professionals can collaborate on a single project to speed up its development.
Additionally, they are similar to low-code automation tools, but no-code technologies don't require programming expertise. Not to forget, the tools comprise of all the elements required for application development. As such, they are quite popular and used in Bubble and Makerpad.
Furthermore, these platforms are ideal if testers want a simple application for a specific business purpose. Instead of waiting for your software development team to deliver it, you can assemble a team and develop an application in a quick time.
No-code and codeless automation are the same as they don’t involve extensive coding during app development. In addition, codeless automation platforms can also consist of NLP and self-healing features which allow the tool to modify the tests according to the changes in the user interface.
A skilled programmer might need to automate a web script and have sufficient time to go ahead with it. In such a situation, Selenium is the best automation testing tool for the project.
The tool is open-source software that supports most browsers and is preferred for web applications. Additionally, to enhance the test automation process, codeless Selenium has emerged in recent times.
Selenium automation testing requires superior programming expertise and app developmental abilities. The tools support major programming languages like Python, Java, Ruby, and PHP. Moreover, it offers a suite of tools such as Selenium WebDriver, Selenium IDE, and Selenium Grid.
Due to these features, developers accustomed to low-code or no-code platforms might face difficulties operating this platform.
Moreover, the test scenarios are complex and very structured and hence tales sufficient time to set up the testing process and maintain the scripts. In addition, testers might require third-party integrations to execute some tests. As such, developers with strict project deadlines might not prefer code-based Selenium.
As the name suggests, codeless Selenium testing is all about executing test scripts faster with less code involved. This approach enables testers of various skills and expertise to start working on an application. So, it reduces the complexity of the automation testing process.
Additionally, it has less complicated test scripts which aren’t heavily structured which allows testers and developers to create test scripts and execute test cases faster than code-based Selenium.
So, each codeless test usually takes approximately an hour.
For instance, Selenium IDE is a useful tool that makes codeless testing convenient. Testers can record interactions in the browser and playback them easily. This automatically reduces the time and complexity of executing the tests.
Moreover, another excellent feature of codeless Selenium automation is test case reusability which allows testers and other team members to reuse already created test cases.
So, they save a substantial amount of time by avoiding developing test scripts for multiple scenarios. Not to forget, cross-browser testing is also much faster and more convenient in the codeless approach.
Besides, professionals can lessen the complexities of maintaining these test scripts. As a result, they can spend more time enhancing the product, innovation, and deployment.
To implement codeless automated testing, it is crucial to identify the tests that need automation to help the testers and the company enhance their testing processes.
These variations include:
Organizations can consider manual tests which make for the most common testing strategy across the globe. This is evident in a recent survey that showed that companies execute manual and automated testing with a ratio of 75:25.
Here, 9% of the survey respondents stated that they carry out only manual testing, but 73% would like to achieve a ratio of 50:50. However, 14% of these firms want to discontinue manual testing and shift to codeless automation.
The primary reason behind this change is the significant amount of time manual testing entails and its complexity.
Testers would also prefer to automate inconsistent or flaky test scripts that often provide undesirable results.
These tests might lead to returning false negatives or return failures and passes without any code modifications. But, handling these inconsistent tests gets difficult with time, as application development becomes complex and the amount of code increases.
So, along with these tests, companies must also consider automating tests needing substantial expertise.
As every company may not be able to manage the necessary resources or hire new employees, automation will be a boon for them.
Before starting with codeless automation, you need to identify the tests you wish to automate.
These can be the time-consuming and flaky tests that complicate your testing processes. Furthermore, it is important to determine the tests that create instability within your testing pipeline. To do so, you must follow the listed steps:
If the company doesn't have an automation suite for implementation, starting with repeatable yet simple tests is a commendable strategy. Regression tests and smoke tests are the most recommended test strategies here.
Testers can start by applying codeless automation for a small number of tests to evaluate the process’s efficiency. However, they have to be careful to ensure that these tests are absolutely atomic and independent from other tests. This is important because it will allow them to execute these tests efficiently without affecting other test scripts.
Additionally, in case the organization has a scripted test automation suite, they must regularly replace scripted tests with codeless tests.
The next most important step is to identify the professionals who will be handling the entire testing procedure.
It's important to gather the required professionals, including testers, developers, product engineers, and release managers, for moving forward with the process.
This will be a structured approach that will stabilize the codeless automation processes. Moreover, these professionals will be able to track the testing progress and analyze the outcomes.
As codeless automation offers many reusable components, testers can utilize modular blocks of tests that might be already in place. So, if they want to test the specific functionality of an application, they can use the associated test block rather than prepare an end-to-end test script.
This will allow teams to also evaluate these small test cases separately to increase the testing efficiency.
In addition, testis can also utilize some repeatable test steps, which can work as prerequisites for other cases.
Developers and testers are looking for codeless automation tools that will offer maximum usability, reliability, and flexibility during testing. Hence, companies must select the appropriate codeless testing tools for their business operations.
Being a cost-effective and less time-consuming method, codeless automation tools allow testers to enhance application quality.
To understand this better, let’s look at some of the best codeless automation tools currently used in the industry:
Katalon Studio is one of the most popular codeless testing platforms supporting testers of a variety of skill levels. It is ideal for developing desktop, mobile, APIs, and web solutions. Plus, it offers a solid automation framework for added convenience.
Moreover, it provides a record and playback feature to capture test movements and a BDD Cucumber feature for conveying test scenarios to facilitate team collaboration. Furthermore, the Katalon TestOps functionality enhances the workflow along with DevOps and test orchestration.
This is a user-friendly cloud-based automation tool that supports applications for Windows, SAP Testing, and the Web. It allows professionals to combine and reuse test flows and perform cross-browser testing efficiently. Moreover, testers can conveniently integrate it with their existing DevOps toolset.
Additionally, testers get notified through an SMS alert if there are performance errors and they can view reports on the live dashboards for performing modifications.
This is another cloud-based web and mobile application that is powered by a record and playback functionality. It doesn't require extra plugins but supports parallel execution for multiple data sets.
Its smart binding feature captures application changes and attributes like position, size, or text value. Additionally, the platform offers numerous built-in integrations such as Issue Management, Communication, Notifications, and Test Management.
Not to forget, the analysis and reports of every test step also help testers evaluate the automation test’s efficiency.
Ranorex Studio is a multipurpose codeless automation tool that is suitable for mobile, desktop, web, and cross-platform testing. Preferred by experienced and beginner testers, it comes with drag and drop objects and regression testing code modules.
Hence, professionals can easily integrate this platform with Android, iOS, Java, HTML5, and Silverlight. Furthermore, the flexible automation interface makes integration and test execution convenient and testers can utilize the Ranorex Spy and RanoreXPath features for identifying GUI elements during testing.
Organizations must ensure that all selected codeless automation tool is suitable for professionals with varied technical skills and experiences. Hence, they must follow the listed approaches for selecting these tools:
One of the most important benefits of codeless automation is it allows companies to free up resources and improve the testing processes. As professionals take lesser time for automation testing, they can spend more time on exploratory application testing.
The approach hence helps them understand the nuances of the application and suggest areas for improvement. Furthermore, with parallel test execution, companies can execute more tests in a variety of environments. All of this helps reduce their expenses and increase the efficiency of their organizational strategies.
As codeless automation testing tools are equipped to handle multiple applications such as desktop and mobile apps, the automation scope is huge.
These tests involve several interfaces and offer maximum flexibility. So, it becomes easier to scale the automation of several applications and support project integration.
Moreover, it also allows testers to evaluate possible risks and issues in the application.
The codeless automation tools have excellent functionalities to make the testing process convenient and simple. They offer a user-friendly interface and features that non-technical professionals too can learn.
Moreover, having a shallow learning curve, codeless automation allows professionals to start testing right after they register for the tool. Not to forget, most tools offer product tours and simple configurations to make the testing process smooth.
Upgrading standard automation testing platforms is a difficult task for most professionals. But in codeless automation, companies receive excellent scalability as most of the tools are cloud-based.
This makes it much more convenient to scale up the tools according to the project and product requirements. In addition, it provides greater security and is less expensive than scaling a traditional automation system.
As such, companies can utilize saved costs to increase the application’s functionalities.
Codeless testing tools facilitate the reusability of test steps of cross projects, applications, and even operating systems.
The tools might also prioritize a particular test case's reusability and automatically update the test cases. These practical features thus help in saving time and expenses.
It is expected that by 2026, the automation testing market might be worth $49.9 billion. This is because more companies are adopting codeless automation to free up their resources, enhance collaboration and elevate product standards. It proves beneficial as they won’t have to hire more testers. So, codeless automation can be considered the future of modern testing. With artificial intelligence, analytics, and IoT becoming popular in codeless tools, professionals will have more flexibility to execute tests.

Regression testing is a form of software testing that involves executing functional and non-functional tests again and again. These tests are carried out to guarantee that previously designed, and tested software continues to function properly even after a modification has been made. It primarily examines if an application's UI is still looking good once a new feature has been implemented. In addition, it is a verification procedure that looks for any new flaw or fault in the current software.
When we talk about visual mistakes, we're not talking about logical problems in the system; we're talking about aesthetic flaws that cause interfaces to appear improperly, degrading the user experience.
Some of the common UI defects are as follows:
Most consumers will not return to your website or app if they have a poor experience visiting it. In addition, users don't like to visit websites with fundamental issues. Therefore, the content of the website should be clear, concise, and crisp.
Visual errors are issues with the design or layout of an online or mobile application's interface. As a result, users may experience application problems when they visit your app or website. In addition, these visual flaws wreak havoc on an app's user experience.
Visual regression testing is done to conduct UI or front-end regression testing by gathering screenshots of the UI and comparing them to the original or baseline pictures. If there is a slight variation from the baseline image utilizing the captured mobile UI, the visual regression mechanism will alert you and highlight the pixel-by-pixel problem.
Visual testing examines an application's visual output and compares it to the results predicted by the designer. Visual tests may be conducted at any moment on any application with a graphical user interface. Most developers conduct visual tests on individual components during development, and during end-to-end testing, they run visual tests on a fully functional program. Thus, a regression test functions similarly to a verification technique. However, test cases are often automated as they must be executed repeatedly, and it can be tiresome to execute the same test cases manually.
Programming languages, such as Java, C++, C#, and others, are not required for regression testing. Instead, it’s a type of testing utilized to see whether the product has been modified or if any updates have been made. It ensures that any changes to a product do not disrupt the product's current modules.

Here's an example of a visual flaw in Amazon's mobile experience: the filter bar covers the product description, which is inconvenient for shoppers who want to read it quickly. Of course, the issue is inconvenient in this situation, but there are other times when a visual fault renders a program useless. For instance, when a visible component shifts or vanishes entirely.
Once the developer has fixed the problem, it must be re-tested. Regression testing is also required because while the price on the reported page may have been corrected, it may still show an incorrect price on the summary page. The total is displayed alongside other charges or in the email sent to the customer. Unfortunately, automated UI tests aren't designed to check for visual errors. Thus they'd miss this one. Even tech titans, as seen in the Amazon example, are not resistant to these flaws. Visual mistakes in an application are conceivable as automated UI testing does not discover them. It's critical to find these issues since they may significantly influence an app's usability and accessibility and the user experience.
If a visual problem prevents a user from accessing an application's core functions, it should be reported as a functional bug.
While it is self-evident that you must examine your website for regression, many individuals mistakenly believe this includes the aesthetic element. On the contrary, visual regression testing is unique from functional regression testing. It examines whether any new code has hampered the functionality of a page. In contrast, functional regression testing examines whether the latest code has impeded the usability of a page.
There are several browsers, mobile devices, and screen sizes to consider for web development. For example, a single page in the system may be displayed by Chrome or Firefox, viewed by small, medium, or large desktop displays, and browsed by various operating systems on mobile devices with various screen sizes.
Understanding the difference is critical since a visually "altered" page may work perfectly and pass all functionality tests. When we consider browser rendering and responsive design, where the web pages are autonomously scaled, and some components are concealed, reduced, or extended to look good across all screen sizes, the difference becomes even more apparent.
Unfortunately, functional testing doesn't pick up these more subtle design changes regarding user involvement, which can vary from moderately uncomfortable to outright unpleasant and disruptive.
Visual regression testing becomes even more necessary when dealing with responsive systems to discover compatibility issues while rendering websites. Furthermore, those tests may detect some of the cross-platform issues that are more difficult to detect. Websites or web pages must be visually perfect in all screen sizes and all operating systems. It must be compatible with all screen sizes and should be responsive.
Opera or Chrome might display a single page in the system, viewed on small (under 6-7 inches), medium (10-12 inches), or large (desktop) displays, and browsed by several operating systems on mobile devices with a wide range of screen sizes.
Automated visual testing is a method of determining if a user interface appears visually as intended. If you need regression visual testing to deal with frequent changes to a stable UI, automation is a smart option. Automated testing also aids in a great visual comparison of screenshots.
The advantages of automating visual tests are that they save money in the long run. In addition, they are faster and accurate than manual tests because they can eliminate human errors and deliver pixel-perfect visual tests, are reusable, and are transparent because they provide automatic reports that are easily accessible by anyone on the team.
Automated snapshot comparison improves the precision of visual inspection while also increasing the return on investment. Bugs that are hard to identify with human eyes and manual comparison can be captured with automatic snapshot comparison. It's also beneficial for complicated user story end-to-end testing.
When manual regression testers do regression testing, test cases are first written and then executed. These tests assist in determining if a test is a pass or a fail based on the expected results specified in the test cases. Automated regression testing entails many stages. The generation of effective test data and the development of quality test cases are critical for test computerization. There are various automated regression testing solutions available, and organizations should choose one based on the application being tested.
Testing is just repeating a process in a given circumstance for a specific reason. As a result, we can confidently deduce that the same approach used for testing in the first place may also be used for this. As a result, if manual testing is possible, so is regression testing. It is not required to utilize a tool. However, as time passes, programs get increasingly bloated with features, growing the danger of regression. Therefore, this testing is frequently automated to make the most of the time.
Visual regression testing should be automated and integrated into the CI/CD workflow. This saves time, minimizes the risk of human mistakes, and guarantees that the software's aesthetic attractiveness is maintained.
Automated visual regression testing tools analyze pictures "pixel by pixel" to check for changes caused by faults or bad practices. It allows businesses to guarantee that these changes do not negatively impact the final product experience.
Automated visual testing analyzes the graphic look of a test application and compares the results to known excellent screenshots to see whether they match. In addition, this method evaluates graphic value criteria such as paint consistency, alignment, size, etc.
If you are short of time, you should avoid using this method. Visual regression testing is time-consuming and should not be utilized unless you have a strict deadline. Neither automatic nor entirely manual visual regression testing is possible. It is preferable to use a combination of automated and manual visual regression. When comparing pictures, don't rely on tool error configuration ratios.
Visual regression testing is one of the most reliable ways to reach the desired output. The essential factor is whether the human eye can detect the change is put into the system of this testing method.
Visual testing is used in conjunction with functional testing to analyze the visual quality while testing an application. This is challenging for functional automation frameworks to capture because they are designed and implemented to focus solely on functional elements.
Let's have a look at a few tools for visual regression testing:
The complete visual UX testing solution and visual validation is Kobiton's scriptless automated visual testing solution. In addition, Kobiton is a mobile testing tool that offers complete visual validation and visual user experience testing for mobile devices.
BrowserStack's Percy is an automated visual testing platform designed for task forces to conduct automated visual validation tests. It enables you to create, develop, and distribute software. Smart visual regression testing, responsive visual testing, and cross-browser testing are all supported.
Applitools Eyes is a cloud-based facility for automatic visual UI testing of mobile, web, and desktop applications from Applitools. It verifies the visual output of your UI across a variety of browsers, operating systems, devices, and screen sizes.
BackstopJS is a JavaScript-based framework for visual regression testing. BackstopJS sees your website just as a black box, so you don't need to write your website in JavaScript to use it. One of its features is very detailed and helpful as it points out the differences among your pictures, which is included in the report it creates.
Chromatic aids in the consistency of UI elements. It captures pixel-perfect images of rendered code, style, and assets in real-time. In addition, every commit to the repository is automatically checked in the cloud for visible changes.
Teams may use Screener to examine their UI across various operating systems, browsers, and other electronic devices. It detects visual regressions and inconsistencies in the UI automatically. It shows changes by comparing screenshots and DOM snapshots.
Regression testing is a proven method of ensuring that an application stays defect-free even after several modifications. It also guarantees that no current functionality has been harmed as a result of the recent changes. Regression testing should be used to discover issues in a new software release while also ensuring that prior defects have been addressed. Any new feature should be subjected to regression testing, validated using an efficient regression test automation approach, and maybe checked manually or using an automated regression testing framework and tools.
There are a variety of automated visual regression testing solutions. Choosing one may be influenced by your demands and budget, as well as the goals you wish to achieve. QED42 is a full-service solution provider that uses design and technology to create ambitious digital experiences for consumers worldwide.
It helps companies reinvent themselves to provide superior data-driven online, mobile, and social experiences. Our intelligently crafted online and mobile experiences have earned us the confidence of over 200 worldwide customers. Sony, Intel, and others are among our notable clients. In addition, our extensive knowledge in Drupal, JavaScript frameworks, and design thinking can convert organizations into intelligent enterprises.

The number of active mobile applications has reached over 7.5 billion. mobile applications are not only enabling customers to communicate but also to shop and pay bills. Hence, the importance of understanding the concept of mobile testing is becoming crucial. Furthermore, mobile automation testing ensures cost-effectiveness and also delivers a faster Return of Investment (ROI).
Mobile automation testing is a process of testing mobile applications via tools like TestComplete Mobile, AI Test Creation and Analytics For iOS and Android, Appium (Android and iOS), and many more. It helps in reducing the time taken for testing mobile applications. Mobile automation testing is a technique of building application software by testing its usability, consistency, and functionality.
The mobile solutions delivered should be tested very well. The aim is to promote mobile testing or improve the knowledge of those who have switched to it lately. Nowadays, mobility solutions have gripped the market. People do not wish to switch on their laptops/PCs to look for or learn everything. They want handy devices such as smartphones to solve their queries quickly.
We are here to guide you about everything you need to know and understand about mobile automation testing. Our main goal is to provide you with every tip and trick of mobile automation and create a clear picture of this concept.
Today, there are millions of smartphone users. This can help achieve growth in the mobile apps' space in business operations. Hence, with so many enterprises producing millions of apps and smartphones, mobile automation testing is important to ensure app safety and effectiveness. Here are some of the reasons why businesses should leverage mobile test automation.
Mobile automation testing produces a high quality product and improves the app development process. Here are different types of mobile app testing:
When you know the answer to the following questions, you'll be saving a lot of your time and money. In addition, it decreases the number of devices needed for testing.
Steps in mobile testing
After creating a mobile app with every feature, mobile automation testing should be implemented to ensure that the mobile app is a success and does not require any future changes. It involves a few steps: https://www.testingxperts.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/mobile-app-automation-testing.jpg
Just building a mobile application and launching it to the consumer world does not make sense. Instead, proper mobile testing is necessary to ensure the mobile applications' compatibility and make them user-friendly. Here are some of the factors you should keep in mind before testing mobile applications:
Testing of mobile applications requires business goals. It helps in setting the approach and efforts required for mobile testing. The overall mobile testing approach depends on various objectives. Cost-effectiveness, enhanced test coverage, and faster time-to-market are some objectives for mobile testing.
Mobile testing brings down the efforts, costs, and money. It helps in achieving better test coverage. Hence, there should be a proper plan for mobile automation. It should be implemented by keeping in mind the objectives and goals of the required mobile application. Security, compatibility, responsiveness, and accessibility should be a part of mobile automation.
Virus and cyber-attacks are becoming likely to attack your mobile applications. Unfortunately, mobile applications are vulnerable and sensitive to such viruses. It can expose information to other users. So, along with the testing performance of mobile applications, test the security of mobile applications too. Security tests include security scanning, risk assessment, penetration testing, and ethical hacking.
New approaches in mobile testing require early tests to ensure the quality of the devices and make them ready for usage. Thus, early tests help in saving costs and ensure the quality of mobile applications. Dev-ops, Shift-Left, and Agile are some of the testing approaches that help save costs and check the quality of your mobile applications.
Mobile automation testing produces a higher quality product and improves the app development process. Here are some of the tips and tricks for mobile automation:
Appium- Appium is also an open-source framework for mobile, hybrid, and native mobile apps. It drives Android, Windows apps, and IOS using the Webdriver protocol.
Calabash- Calabash is a mobile automation framework that allows developers who do not have coding skills to execute and create automated tests for IOS and Android applications.
Robotium- Robotium is an open source test framework which makes it easier for developers to write robust and powerful tests for mobile android applications.
Selendroid- Selendroid is an open-source framework interacting with multiple emulators and devices. It is UI-driven by hybrid apps.
Espresso- Espresso testing tools enable developers to write test cases for UI-User interface testing.
XCUITest- XCUITest testing tools enable developers to record transactions with the User Interface-UI or play test code from the start.
TestProject.io- TestProject.io is a free online mobile automation tool designed for developers and testers.
Mobile automation testing is all about selecting apt mobile simulators, choosing the right testing devices and tools, designing the perfect strategy, and making sure there are no compromises to mobile applications’ safety, security, functionality, and performance. Mobile automation testing is not an easy task, but it has to be done properly. Otherwise, your mobile devices are not ready to be launched into the consumer world.
To ensure that mobile devices are useful and deliver the intended result, mobile automation testing is mandatory. It helps in identifying the defects initially and avoids additional costs. In addition, it will make your device user-friendly. You must know every aspect involved in mobile testing.
At QED42 we check the quality, performance, and functionality of your mobile applications. We are here for you from the beginning till the end. Learn more about our mobile automation testing services here.

Security threats can tremendously impact your web and mobile applications. When your mobile and web applications are not secured and safe via security testing, it makes the web apps vulnerable to security attacks like threats, risks, and misuse of data. Users tend to avoid applications with security threats as they are afraid that their data will be misused.
According to recent research, 17% of breaches include malware attacks; 45% were hacking and 22% were phishing attacks.
Hence, security testing is a must to make mobile and web applications safe and user-friendly. Security testing is a type of software testing that helps in discovering threats, vulnerability and risks in mobile and web applications. It is conducted to identify any threat in the application and helps in preventing attacks from intruders.
Security Testing should be a part of your mobile and web application development life cycle as it helps in developing and deploying secure software. The purpose of this is to find out all the weaknesses and loopholes in the system that may result in revenue loss and information loss.
Security testing aims to analyze various security sections by following these six principles: authenticity, availability, continuity, confidentiality, authorization, and non-repudiation. In addition, security testing ensures that the software information and data are protected from any losses.
When we talk about the internet and the web, online security is a matter of concern. If the web or mobile applications cannot protect the data, no one will ever use it. For example, if your site has a payment protocol, then the user’s banking information with his email id data must be secured. If these details reach the wrong hands, the user can get into trouble. Thus, establishing a security system that helps identify the loopholes beforehand saves online businesses or users from security attacks and misuse of sensitive information.
The security system helps in detecting any threats or risks on the software. In addition, it helps to identify loopholes and risks associated with the software system. When it comes to the web, security is the topmost priority. If, while using an application, your transaction data is not secure, users will think twice before using it. Security testing helps develop solutions around these loopholes through the means of coding and delivering flawless and secure applications. Security testing is needed to make sure all the information and data are secure and safe.
Security testing helps identify the loopholes that were not discovered during the code review, security white box test. In addition, it helps in identifying the applications’ vulnerabilities that were ignored during the first screening test and the development phase of the software.
Security testing works on six principles. These principles help in developing an integrated system that helps in securing the data of the users.
There are seven types of security testing mentioned in the Open Source Security Testing methodology manual:
A desktop application should be secured for its access and storage of the data. Likewise, a web application requires even more security than a desktop application for its access and to protect its data. While making a web application, a web developer should ensure that it is immune to Brute Force Attacks, XSS, and SQL injections. In addition, Brute force attacks are dangerous to web applications and desktop software and applications.
It is a known fact that the cost of security testing will be more if it is done after the software implementation stage. Hence, it becomes necessary to include security testing in the initial stages of your System Development Life Cycle (SDLC).
Here is the security process that should be adopted for every stage in the SDLC:
In security testing, several methodologies are followed:
Tiger Box - Tiger box is a type of hacking done on a laptop comprising hacking and OS tools. This methodology for security testing helps security testers and penetration testers to conduct vulnerability attacks and assessments.
Black Box - The tester is permitted to conduct tests related to technology and network topology.
Grey Box - The tester is given partial information about the system, and it is a mixture of black and white box models.
Follow are the mentioned approaches while planning and preparing for security testing:
There are many tools available for security testing. Some of them are mentioned below:
The intruder is a security testing tool that is easy to understand and use. It is a vulnerability scanner that is enterprise-grade. It conducts over ten thousand high-quality security tests over your IT infrastructure involving application weaknesses, missing patches, and configuration weaknesses. It provides proactive scans and accurate tests. It also helps in saving time and keeps applications safe from hackers.
The OWASP: Open Web Application Security Project focuses on improving the security of applications and software. It is a non-profit organization comprising several tools to penetrate many software protocols and environments.
Acunetix is easy to use, and it helps small and medium-sized companies ensure that their web applications are immune to costly data breaches and are perfectly secured. Acunetix detects a wide range of web security threats and issues. It helps developers to detect such issues early to solve them immediately.
Wireshark is a security and network analysis tool also known as Ethereal. Wireshark is a network packet analyzer that provides details about the decryption, network protocols, packet information, and many more. It can also be used on OSX, Linux, Solaris, Windows, NetBSD, and other systems. The results depicted from these security tools can be seen through TTY and GUI.
W3af is an audit framework and a web application attack. It comprises three different types of plugins: audit, attack, and discovery, which communicate to check any vulnerability on site. For instance, a discovery plugin focuses on several URLs to check vulnerabilities and then forwards it to the audit plugin that uses these URLs to find vulnerabilities.
Burp suite testing tool which uses PortSwigger's research to help in finding vulnerability and threats in web applications. It provided quicker automated results.
Wapiti is a web application vulnerability scanner that enables users to audit the security of web applications and websites. Wapiti covers errors such as SQL injections, XSS, Shellshock, open redirects, XXE injection and many more.
Let’s get to know about the facts and myths about security testing:
Security testing points out areas that require improvements which lead to improved efficiency and web application. Security testing makes your web application secured and immune to various security attacks like SQL injections and Brute Force Attacks. Hence, security testing gives ROI.
Anyone and everyone is required to have a security policy. Security policies and testing are necessary for every type of organization, whether it is small or big. Security testing helps in finding loopholes that will make your web application better.
Security testing is the most mandatory and necessary type of testing for a web application. It ensures that all the confidential information in an application stays secure. Mobile apps are vulnerable to hacking attacks. We simulate hacking attacks on your app and identify security loopholes along with relevant recommendations. We also provide backend security/server-side security testing for larger applications. Know more about our Quality Assurance services here.

Ever since Selenium 4 was announced in August 2018, the QA testing world was excited and thrilled for the latest enhancement of a QA tester’s best tool. On October 13, 2021, the stable Selenium 4 was officially released after the release of its Alpha and Beta versions. The exciting new features of Selenium 4 are way beyond what anyone could have anticipated and in this blog, this is exactly what we’re going to cover.
We have explored these new features in our series blogs with code snippets
Relative locators is the new feature introduced in Selenium 4 to locate WebElements relative to other elements. To deep dive, visit our blog on relative locators
Selenium 4 provides the capability to capture screenshots at different UI levels - element, Section, Full Page. In the screenshots blog, we have covered why we need this feature and how we can achieve it in Selenium 4, with example codes
With Selenium 4, we have a new API to handle the opening of new windows/tabs and switching between windows during test execution. Visit our blog to understand how working with Windows has changed from Selenium 3 to Selenium
Native support for Chrome DevTools Protocol is one of the major Selenium 4 features. You can refer to this blog to learn more about the implementation of CDP in detail
With the introduction of new features, there has been deprecation and modification of methods on Selenium 4. Explore them in this article.
Note: Find the sample code snippets for these features in the GitHub repository here.
Have you tried Selenium 4? If yes, do let us know what features you liked the most, along with the overall experience of working with Selenium 4!
Happy Testing !!!

There are various new features added in Selenium 4. These enhancements are accompanied by deprecations and the addition of some methods. Let’s understand the deprecated methods and their replacement.
In Selenium 3, some driver constructors accept the DesiredCapabilities object as a parameter. DesiredCapabilities is a class that is used to set basic properties of browsers such as browser name, browser version, operating systems etc. to perform cross-browser testing.
In Selenium 4, DesiredCapabilities is replaced with Options. The Options interface provides methods to change the properties of the browser such as cookies, incognito, headless, disable pop-ups, add extensions, etc. Testers can either use only Options or combine Desired Capabilities with Options.
Note: Options are preferably used with Capabilities for customizing driver sessions.

Actions class in Selenium provides methods to automate mouse and keyboard user interaction with WebElement of the web application. Selenium 4 provides few additional Actions methods which replace the classes under the org.openqa.selenium.interactions package.
In Selenium 3, toGitHub click a webelement we could use either of below two methods:

Selenium 4 provides a new method click(WebElement) in the Actions class which works as a replacement for the above methods.
Snippet
doubleClick(WebElement) method is used to perform double click on a WebElement. This method replaces moveToElement(WebElement).doubleClick() in Selenium 4.

Snippet:
Output

contextClick(WebElement) method is used to perform a right click on a WebElement. This method replaces moveToElement(WebElement).contextClick() in Selenium 4.
Snippet
Output

clickAndHold(WebElement) method is used to perform click action on a WebElement without releasing the mouse. This method replaces moveToElement(WebElement).clickAndHold() in Selenium 4.
Snippet
Output Screenshot: The screenshot after moving the dragbox by some offset using clickAndHold() method

The release() and release(WebElement) methods are used for releasing the depressed left mouse button.

Snippet
Output Screenshot: The screenshot after dragging and releasing the box from source to destination

The sample codes are available at the Github repository here.
FluentWait<T> implements a generic functional interface Wait<T>.
Selenium 4 has replaced the TimeUnit with Duration. The Duration class can be imported from java.time package and has methods to represent time duration in nano, millis, seconds, minutes, hours, days and so on. The method implicitlyWait(long , TimeUnit) from the type WebDriver.Timeouts are also deprecated. In Selenium 4, implicitlyWait method takes only one parameter.
The FindsBy interface, part of the org.openqa.selenium.internal package, is deprecated in Selenium 4. The changes are internal to the Selenium framework. Therefore, Selenium users can continue using the FindElement(By) and FindElements(By) as used in Selenium 3.
This article covers the deprecated, modified and new methods in Selenium 4. We need to consider these changes when we are migrating from Selenium 3 to Selenium 4.

Behat is an open-source behaviour driven development framework for PHP. Behat is used to write code in easy human-readable statements for automated functional tests. The framework uses the Gherkin syntax. These statements are simple English text which makes it easier to understand the feature and the automated scenarios.
Feature: Forgot password functionality
Scenario: Verify Forgotten Password link
Step 1: Create a new directory and create a composer.json file inside your directory. So, you can install the dependencies using composer. In composer.json mention the dependency and configuration as mentioned below:
Note: We are using a Drupal extension for setup which will automatically download behat dependencies, you can also use behat, mink, etc. packages directly.
Step 2: Open the terminal and run the following command in your directory:
composer install
It will start installing all the dependencies which are required for behat setup under the vendor directory.
Step 3: Now run the following command to create the default directory structure.
bin/behat --init
This will create a features folder with FeatureContext.php class file in features/bootstrap, where we can keep the custom step definitions and logics required to execute the test cases. The behat directory will look as below:

Step 4: Next step is to create a behat.yml file in the root folder, which will be the configuration file from which the behat executor will know about our environment and extensions to be used while executing test cases. Add the following to behat.yml
Step 5: Creating a feature file
What is a feature file?
A feature file is an actual test case that will hold all the scenarios, Let’s say for example - login functionality that needs to be automated, we need to create a login.feature file inside features folder and that will consist of - Feature, Background(optional), Scenario and Steps.
Let’s see an example of a login.feature file:
As you can see, the login feature file consists of two different scenarios for valid and invalid credentials.
Best Practice Tip: do not write XPath or CSS paths in feature files, use labels, id, name or attributes which are easily readable.
Step 6: Execute behat test, you need to run the following command - bin/behat features/login.feature
This feature file will run on the base_url which is mentioned in the behat.yml file.

Yay.! The behat setup is ready
Every PHP function which is mapped to the step in the feature file is called step definition, so wherever a step is executed a mapped PHP function gets executed. Step definition holds the actual code and logic of steps
We are using the Mink and Drupal extension which provides us with most of the predefined steps that can be used to write tests. You can see all available steps using this command - bin/behat -dl
But we might need to write custom step definitions based on our application, in such cases, we can write custom step definitions in FeatureContext.php.
For example, I need to write a logout step for my application, I will create the following step definition in the FeatureContext.php file
To call this step definition we can use And I logout step in the feature file.
Passing data to Step Definition: The step definition can accept parameters that can be used in functions to make it more generic and reusable.
For example, I need a step definition to click a button, I can write a to step definition in the following way by passing a label as a parameter.
In the above way, I can pass the label of the specific input type-button (eg. Save, Submit, Cancel etc) to function and it will get clicked.
To call this step definition we can use And I press the “Save” button step in the feature file where “Save” will be the parameter for your step definition.
Here is a list of mostly used plugins for behat:
As we know, automation is the best way to increase the effectiveness, efficiency and coverage of our testing. Behat is easy to set up and gherkin language makes it easier to understand the test cases for non-technical stakeholders, also it comes with extensions like mink and Drupal which provides predefined steps that can be directly used in writing test cases which reduces the time required for custom code.

At the time of writing scenarios, we always tend to write the positive flow to check whether the functionality is working fine and as expected. This is obvious, but as a Quality Analyst do you think this is the right way of adding scenarios? Don't you think we should first try to break the functionality?
Here is where "Negative scenarios" come into the picture.
Positive testing is to check if the system is working as expected but negative testing is used to determine how the system handles the unexpected behaviour. We should always think about the negative side of the application to break the application. Developers are building the application as per the given acceptance criteria so it is obvious that the functionality will work fine in most cases. So it's the responsibility of the Quality Analyst, to think out of the box in terms of breaking the application.
In this case, we will search for one product (maybe of a single keyword, to finish up my testing) and check if it displays the results or not. Which is what we often do when we try to test something in a positive way.
This is not enough and we should not stop here!
Going further, what if we search for the two words which are not displaying the results as expected. One possibility might be that the keywords are not accepting AND/OR combinations. Or the tester doesn't have the idea of thinking in that way while writing the scenarios.
In this case, if we have a requirement where the image upload field is only accepting file formats like .jpg and .png. Now to break this functionality or check how it behaves if we try to upload files with extensions other than the approved ones mentioned above we should try to upload other files such as:
In this case, if we have one of the requirements where it accepts only VISA card, then we should consider below negative cases such as:
When writing negative test cases, we should always consider the boundaries and equivalence partitioning techniques. Set up your requirement test data in positive-negative input values before writing the negative test cases. To think about the negative scenarios, you should have a good understanding of the requirements. Unless and until you don't dig into the requirements, you won't get the negative cases. Always consider the field types for testing negative scenarios. For example, if the input field is accepting only numerics then try to pass the string values.
Negative and positive testing are equally important in building stable and reliable applications. Identifying the negative test cases is a time-consuming process but quite essential. Once you are done with it, the rest is a cakewalk. Thus, Negative testing is a must as it helps in capturing defects before UAT, ensuring a good quality product delivery.

Selenium has always been the most preferred tool suite for automated testing of web applications. Selenium 4 beta comes along with a lot of new features and functionalities. In this blog, we will be exploring Selenium 4’s feature known as Relative Locators (formerly known as Friendly Locators). Relative locators help locate WebElements based on the location relative to other DOM elements.
All of these methods are overloaded to accept a By or a WebElement.
In Selenium 3, when elements were not uniquely identifiable using any of the locator strategies, we used to loop the web elements based on certain conditions and select that required web element. For such scenarios, we can now use relative locators to identify a web element in relation to other web elements.
WebDriver::findElement accepts a new method withTagname(). withTagName() is a static method which internally creates a new instance of RelativeBy class and returns the same RelativeLocator.RelativeBy object.
Syntax:
With Selenium 4 beta.3, Java bindings support with(By) instead of withTagName() allowing users to pick a locator of their choice like By.id, By.cssSelector, etc.

Syntax:
To find the location of the element, Selenium leverages the JavaScript function getBoundingClientRect(). This function returns properties of an element like left, right, top and bottom.
There have been changes made to Relative Locator in Selenium 4 beta 3. Elements are first sorted by proximity and then DOM insertion order, to make the result more accurate and deterministic. Proximity is determined using distance from center points of each element’s bounding client rect.
Let us understand each relative locator with an example of a login form.


Searches and returns the WebElement, which is above the specified element.
The ‘Email Address’ input element is above the ‘Password’ input element in the login form. So, we can use it as below:
Searches and returns the WebElement, which is below the specified element.
Searches and returns the WebElement, which is to the left of the specified element. The ‘Login’ button is to the left of the ‘Forgot Password’ button, so we can use it as below:
Searches and returns the WebElement, which is to the right of the specified element.
Searches and returns the WebElement, which is at most 50px near to the specified element.
We could come across a scenario where finding an element using only one relative locator is not sufficient. So, we can use multiple relative locators to find a fixed web element. Consider, we need to locate the 'Remember Me' checkbox in the login form. This checkbox is below the 'Password' field and above the ‘Google ReCaptcha’ field. Here, we can use below() and above() locators as:
Looking at the below screenshot, we can notice that 'Username', 'Password' and 'Remember Me' web elements have the same position on the x-axis. Therefore, we need to use both below() and above() relative locators to find the 'Remember Me' checkbox.

Note: Selenium 4 Relative Locator methods do not work with overlapping elements.
The sample codes are available at the Github repository here.
Relative Locator is an interesting locator strategy added in Selenium 4, using which testers can access web elements with fewer lines of code. Incorporate relative locators in your Selenium automation testing and share your thoughts with us.
Happy Testing!

Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) is the new API feature in Selenium 4. DevTools is a short form of Developer Tools. With Selenium 4, QA Engineers can leverage Chrome and Microsoft Edge’s debugging protocol to debug, simulate poor network conditions and emulate geolocation for automation testing. This API would help to identify and resolve critical issues of the web pages with ease.
In Selenium 4, both ChromeDriver class and EdgeDriver class extend ChromiumDriver class. ChromiumDriver class extends RemoteWebDriver class. ChromiumDriver class provides 2 methods executeCdpCommand and getDevTools, to control DevTools in Chrome and Microsoft Edge.



DevTools is a class that provides various methods to handle developer options, such as createSession, addListener, close and send.
Let’s see how we can view console logs, enable network conditions, emulate geolocation and ignore certificate warnings using Chrome DevTools Protocol.
We can view console messages logged by the browser and get details of the error using the new APIs. This would help us to identify the root cause of the issue. The DevTools in Selenium 4 provides a way to listen to 4 log levels: Verbose, Info, Warnings and Errors.
Let’s consider we need console logs for QED42’s 404 pages. Here, we cannot get the dev tools using the WebDriver instance. Either, we need to cast the WebDriver object to ChromeDriver using ((ChromeDriver) driver).getDevTools or create a ChromeDriver object.

Sometimes, applications have different features across different locations. Using DevTools, we can emulate geolocation by making the browser be in a different location. This is known as geolocation testing.
Emulation.setGeolocationOverride command of CDP is used to override the location and it takes latitude, longitude and accuracy as parameters.
Below is the snippet to override the current location to New York City:

When testing an application, we need to think about users with a slow internet connection. Chrome DevTools Protocol provides Network.emulateNetworkConditions command to emulate different network conditions. This command takes 5 parameters - offline, latency, downloadThroughput, uploadThroughput and ConnectionType. ConnectionType can be BLUETOOTH, 2G, 3G, 4G, WIFI, ETHERNET and NONE.
Let’s write test scripts to emulate slow internet connection and to compare application loading time between slow network and normal mode.

Some applications have the functionality to support continuing working offline. Applications can be offline due to many reasons such as bad weather, power outage, etc. Let’s see how we can make the Network offline.

Sometimes, you visit websites with SSL issues and browsers give a security warning message. In order to access such websites, you need to approve that you want to continue accessing the website. With Chrome DevTools Protocol, we can ignore these security warnings and load the page.
We will use https://expired.badssl.com/, which generates such security warnings.

The chrome browser skips the warning and loads the site.

The sample codes are available at the GitHub repository here.
With Selenium 4, you can use the Chrome DevTools API to test the application by emulating geolocation and varying network connections. This makes the automation tests more flexible by opening possibilities of customization and emulation.
.avif)
In this 2nd Selenium 4 article, we are going dive into Selenium WebDriver 4's screenshot feature. While performing automation testing using Selenium, we often need to capture screenshots of the webpage or a particular web element. In Selenium 3, users can only take a screenshot of a web page, not a particular element. But with Selenium 4, we can take a screenshot at the element level, section level and full-page level.
In Selenium 4, WebElement has a new method called getScreenshotAs, enabling you to take a screenshot of a specific WebElement. The process consists of finding the required WebElement and then taking a screenshot of it.
Below is the snippet to take a screenshot of the QED42 logo:
On the QED42 homepage, there is a section of services and details of each service.

When the QED42 site is launched, there is a cookie consent pop-up and the QED42 Services section appears below the page fold. So, before we take a screenshot, we need to close the cookie pop-up and then perform a scroll down so that the required section is visible.
Below is the snippet to take the screenshot of “QED42 Services” section:
With Selenium 4, we can take full page screenshots using the getFullPageScreenshotAs() method. It is only available for the Firefox browser. Here, we need to typecast the WebDriver instance to the FirefoxDriver instance instead of typecasting it to the TakesScreenshot interface.
There is a difference between the existing screenshot feature and the new full page screenshot feature. The existing screenshot feature takes a screenshot of the visible part of the page. The new full-page screenshot feature takes a screenshot of the entire page whether we can see it or not.
Let’s understand the difference between a page and full-page screenshots with an example. Consider we need to take a full-page screenshot of the QED42 homepage.
When the above test snippet is run, two screenshots are captured - QED_Full_Page_Screenshot.png and QED_Page_Screenshot.png.
The sample codes are available at the Github repository here.

This article covered the new screenshot feature of Selenium 4 and how we can use it to take screenshots at various UI levels. Testers can use this feature in debugging and bug reporting.
Happy Testing!

Accessibility is the ability to make websites usable by everyone. When a website is not accessible, we are creating barriers and making their impairment a disability. We need to build websites and include accessibility testing in our STLC to cater to people with disabilities for both better business and usability.
Accessibility testing involves checking whether a website abides by WCAG guidelines and accessibility legislation and yields better SEO. It spans both open-source utilities and enterprise-grade platforms.
Open-source tools like Lighthouse, WAVE, Pa11y, and axeTools are widely adopted for their simplicity and community support.
At the same time, platforms like BrowserStack extend coverage with features such as real-device testing, AI-driven detection, and compliance with global regulations.
Let’s explore some widely used accessibility audit tools.
BrowserStack provides a unified, powerful platform for web and mobile app accessibility testing. It integrates manual, automated, and extension-based workflows to help teams ensure compliance with WCAG standards across real devices, browsers, and environments. While not open source, it offers reliable free plans and enterprise-grade capabilities.

BrowserStack Accessibility Testing (Web)
Though an enterprise-grade tool, BrowserStack Accessibility Testing is built to cater to teams of all sizes to help deliver inclusive digital experiences effectively. It ensures adherence to 10+ global regulations, including WCAG, ADA, EAA, and Section 508. The tool offers automated scans, manual testing capabilities, a real device cloud, and seamless integration into development workflows.

Key features
BrowserStack mobile app accessibility testing
Beyond websites, BrowserStack also extends accessibility testing to mobile apps. BrowserStack Mobile App Accessibility Testing streamlines accessibility standard assessments on real iOS and Android devices.
Driven by the Spectra™ Rule Engine, it delivers automated, AI-driven detection of 20+ key WCAG success criteria and ensures maximised coverage and accuracy.

Key features
To use App Accessibility Testing, you can sign up for a free account on BrowserStack.
BrowserStack accessibility toolkit extension
For developers, BrowserStack’s Accessibility Toolkit is available as a browser extension. It integrates directly into Chrome DevTools for fast, in-context testing.

Key features
How to use the extension
Lighthouse is an open-source, automated tool that can audit web pages regarding performance or accessibility issues.
Lighthouse audit report consists of accessibility score, rules that elements fail to meet, passed audits, ‘additional items to manually check’ and ‘not applicable audit for the web page’. Audit scoring is done based on the categories mentioned below and a report is generated:
Lighthouse is available in three workflows:
Lighthouse is built-in the Chrome browser, with no setup or extensions to install, and can be used to test both local sites and authenticated pages. Here’s how you can audit URLs accessibility via Lighthouse Chrome DevTools:

Attached to each section of the report is a documentation/link explaining why that part of your page was audited and how to fix it.

Lighthouse can be configured and reported for advance usage via Node CLI. Follow the below-mentioned steps:
1. Download Node here. If you have it installed already, skip this step
2. Install Lighthouse
3. Run your audit
4. By default, Lighthouse generates the report in an HTML format. The report can also be displayed in JSON format by passing flags.
Note: “The DevTools workflow is the best as it provides the same benefits as the extension workflow, with the added bonus of no installation needed.”
The WAVE tool is a web accessibility evaluation tool, which helps analyze a website for accessibility and compliance with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) standard. WAVE is hosted by webaim.org, and is available as a ‘Website’ and as an ‘extension for Chrome/Firefox browsers’.
The WAVE Chrome and Firefox extensions allow you to evaluate web content for accessibility issues directly within Chrome and Firefox browsers. The extension checks intranet, password-protected, dynamically generated, or sensitive web pages. It can also evaluate locally displayed styles and dynamically-generated content from scripts or AJAX. Follow these simple steps:
What does a WAVE Audit Report include?


Pa11y is an open-source project that helps designers and developers make their web pages more accessible. There is a range of Pa11y free and open-source tools available.
Pa11y is a command-line interface that loads web pages and highlights any accessibility issues it finds. It is useful when you want to run a one-off test against a web page. The Pa11y test result consists of Type, Message, Code, Context and Selector fields.


Pa11y CI can be used to run accessibility tests against multiple URLs or viewports and highlight the issues. You simply need to add the web page URLs in the .pa11yci JSON file (a config file in the current working directory).


Pa11y Dashboard is an open-source web interface that helps keep a track of automated accessibility tests over time. It allows users to view, manage audit tasks, trigger audits and generate reports. Follow these steps:
Note: Refer to our Pa11y blog for installation and configuration steps

axe DevTools is an accessibility testing and audit tool maintained by deque. By using a combination of automated and guided testing, dev teams can catch up to 84% of common accessibility issues without requiring accessibility expertise. Steps to implement axe DevTools:
1. Install “axe DevTools” Chrome / Firefox extension to your respective browser
2. Open the webpage you want to audit
3. Open the browser’s developer tool and click on the “axe DevTools” tab
4. Scan the webpage and audit result will be displayed
5. The audit result contains the issue summary and a detailed description of each issue.
Now save the results
Axe DevTools provides Intelligent Guided Test functionality. These guided tests raise accessibility issues about page content and then build an issue report. This helps developers to identify issues in less time, resulting in cleaner code and a more accessible experience.
Axe DevTools helps present results in a variety of management reports:
Project reports for CI tools, such as Jenkins, Bamboo, or CircleCI can include accessibility metrics. (This feature is available with axeDevTools Enterprise plan)

axe-cli is a command-line interface for the axe to rapidly run accessibility tests in headless chrome.

Accessibility testing is most effective when combined with manual testing and an accessibility audit. When you are choosing an A11y audit tool, focus on factors such as how – the tool manages multiple websites, collects accessibility issues and remediates them, how easy it is to use by both technical and non-technical team members and cost. In this way, you can use audit tools in your project and make the website more accessible.
We help build and maintain digital accessibility by embedding testing and best practices into your development process.
Happy A11y Auditing!!!